The Twenty-Third ASEAN Ministerial Meeting was held in Jakarta from 24 to 25 July 1990. The Meeting was formally opened by His Excellency President Soeharto of the Republic of Indonesia.

The Meeting was attended by His Royal Highness Prince Mohamed Bolkiah, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Brunei Darussalam; His Excellency Mr. Ali Alatas, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia; His Excellency Dato’ Haji Abu Hassan bin Haji Omar, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia; His Excellency Mr. Raul S. Manglapus, Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines; His Excellency Mr. Wong Kan Seng, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Community Development of Singapore; His Excellency Air Chief Marshal Siddhi Savetsila, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Thailand and their respective delegations.

His Excellency Mr. Rusli Noor, Secretary-General of the ASEAN Secretariat and his staff also attended the Meeting.

His Excellency Mr. Michael Somare, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade of Papua New Guinea, attended the open session as Observer.

His Excellency Mr. Ali Alatas, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia chaired the Meeting. His Excellency Dato’ Haji Abu Hassan bin Haji Omar, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia, was elected Vice Chairman.


In his Opening Address, His Excellency President Soeharto of the Republic of Indonesia stated among others that the ASEAN Ministerial Meeting was being held in the midst of profound global change and transition. It was also a time of challenge as well as of new opportunity within the on-going process of detente and conciliation between the two major powers and their respective alliances. The President stressed that the political and economic transformations which continued to unfold in Europe would have farreaching ramifications for future relations among states not confined to the continent alone. The President emphasized that ASEAN, in facing these global changes, needed to maintain a commensurate capacity for dynamic adaptation and to preserve all times a clear and unified sense of purpose. It was therefore pertinent that the present Meeting was not only a routing event, but a time for ASEAN to seize the opportunity to assess particularly and comprehensively its position, interest and objectives within a regional and global context.


The Foreign Ministers noted that the world had changed dramatically in the intervening 12 months between the 22nd and 23rd AMM. Europe had undergone a radical transformation with the dismantling of the Berlin Wall and the democratization of the East European countries. German unification portended a whole new European architecture. East-West relations had improved beyond the level of detente as aid for East European economies, including the USSR, was being actively considered by the West. The relationship between the Warsaw Pact and NATO was undergoing rapid changes. The USSR had redirected its attention towards domestic problems. Plagued by persistent trade and budget deficits, the US was reassessing its global presence and calling on its allies to share the financial burden of their defense.

The Foreign Ministers felt that it was imperative for ASEAN, in taking cognizance of the above developments, to adopt a more flexible and forward looking approach to prepare itself for the challenges of the 90s, and in particular to strengthen itself and intensify intra-ASEAN cooperation.

The ASEAN Foreign Ministers recommend that pursuant to the decision of the Heads of State / Government at the Manila Summit in 1987 and in view of the rapid changes presently taking place in the world, it would be desirable to prepare for the next Summit. They noted that careful preparation would have to be made to ensure a successful Summit.

The Foreign Ministers agreed that the ASEAN Secretariat should develop a capability to conduct annually an exercise to produce an ASEAN Macroeconomic Outlook (AMO) for the consideration of ASEAN Ministers at their meetings. They requested the Secretary-General of the ASEAN Secretariat to pursue the immediate implementation of the AMO project.


The Foreign Ministers reviewed and assessed the latest developments on the Cambodian question and the continuing efforts to find a comprehensive, just and durable solution. They reaffirmed that such a solution could only be achieved by thoroughly preparing the resumption of the negotiating process of the Paris International Conference on Cambodia (PICC) and not by military means. However, they noted with regret that the conflicting parties themselves so far have not sufficiently shown the necessary political will for a negotiated settlement.

The inability of the conflicting parties to seize the opportunity provided by the Informal Meeting on Cambodia (IMC) in Jakarta on 26 February – 1 March 1990 was one of the latest proofs of how inherently intricate the Cambodian question has been, and with the unsuccessful conclusion of the IMC, the momentum of the efforts to seek a negotiated settlement has suffered a drawback. However, they were of the view that the IMC which was meant to revive the interrupted negotiating process of the PICC did achieve considerable progress in formulating a set of principles that would have enabled the conflicting parties to move forward in their efforts to achieve a comprehensive, just and durable solution.

The Foreign Ministers welcomed the efforts of the Five Permanent Members of the UN Security Council. In addition, they appreciated the efforts aimed at reviving the negotiating process by Thailand and Japan which led to the Tokyo Meeting on 4-5 June 1990. They have also followed with appreciation the continuing efforts by Australia.

The Foreign Ministers expressed their concern that if the present deteriorating situation was allowed to continue, the comprehensive settlement of the Cambodian question could become more difficult to achieve. They stressed that any future efforts to revive the negotiating process should take into account the results of the on going regional approaches and consultations among the Five Permanent Members of the UN Security Council and should lead to the early convening of the PICC.

The ASEAN Foreign Ministers urged all Cambodian parties to intensify their efforts to reach and agreement on the creation of SNC consisting of representative individuals with authority among the Cambodian people representing all shades of political opinion. They were of the view that such a SNC should be the embodiment of the independence, sovereignty and unity of Cambodia and should occupy Cambodia’s seat at the UN after it is formed. The ASEAN Foreign Ministers expressed the hope that such a SNC would be constituted by the time the 45th UNGA is convened. They expressed the view that the representation of Cambodia at the UN is a delicate political question and that attempts to change the representation of Cambodia at this time, in the absence of an acceptable SNC, would set back the search for a comprehensive political solution to the Cambodian problem.

The Foreign Ministers expressed their appreciation to the international community for its continued support to the National Government of Cambodia (NGC) in the UN and other international fora. The Foreign Ministers also acknowledged the contribution made by all concerned countries in the sustained efforts in seeking a comprehensive political solution to the Cambodian problem. They hoped that the international community would continue to cooperate with ASEAN in the common efforts to seek a comprehensive, just and durable solution to the Cambodian problem.

They recorded their gratitude to His Excellency Mr. Javier Perez de Cuellar, the UN Secretary-General for his efforts in finding a comprehensive, just and durable settlement of the Cambodian problem. They also expressed their thanks to His Excellency Mr. Rafeeuddin Ahmed, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs in Southeast Asia and welcomed his presence at the 23rd ASEAN Ministerial Meeting

The Foreign Ministers noted with appreciation the continuing efforts of the Ad-Hoc Committee of the ICK towards a comprehensive political settlement.


The Foreign Ministers reviewed the latest situation of the Indochinese asylum seekers in the ASEAN countries concerned. They expressed their concern over the unabated flow of these peoples. This continuing influx has imposed tremendous cost and created severe socioeconomic, political and security problems for the countries of temporary refuge (CTR). It has also developed into a cause of tension not only between the CTR and countries of origin but also, between the CTR and third countries.

The Foreign Ministers reaffirmed that their commitment to the Comprehensive Plan of Action (CPA) adopted at the International Conference on Indochinese Refugees held in Geneva -in June, 1989 is subject to a durable solution of the boat people problem within the agreed time frame. The humanitarian solution to this problem lies in the balanced and coordinated implementation of all the provisions of the CPA.

The Foreign Ministers noted that the resettlement of pre Cut-off Date arrivals has met the target set for the first year of the implementation of the CPA and the expansion of the Orderly Departure Programme. In this connection, they expressed appreciation to all countries concerned for their cooperation. They, however, emphasized that gains in these two areas and in the very limited voluntary repatriation have been more than offset by the unrelenting arrivals.

The Foreign Ministers expressed their deep concern that one year after the adoption of the CPA, the CTR have not experienced any amelioration of the intolerable burden they bear. Instead, they have been pressured to continue to provide temporary refuge while fundamental elements of the CPA have not been addressed. The Foreign Ministers emphasized that they can no longer accept Vietnam’s plea of its inability to deter clandestine departures. They can also no longer accept the continued opposition by Vietnam and the US to involuntary repatriation. Involuntary repatriation is provided for in the CPA and is consistent with international practices reflecting the responsibility of states towards their own citizens

The Foreign Ministers stressed that implementation of repatriation of Vietnamese boat people, whether voluntary or otherwise, must not impose further burden on the countries of temporary refuge. In this connection, they urgently called for the creation of a special international arrangement for the repatriation of all Vietnamese non-refugees, whereby the UNHCR will be responsible for all aspects of the procedural and financial undertakings for such repatriation. Toward this end, they appealed to the international community to provide necessary support to the UNHCR.

The Foreign Ministers emphasized that the survival of the CPA hinges on the resolution of the issue of involuntary repatriation. They urged all parties concerned with the viability of the CPA, particularly Vietnam and the US, to accept the implementation of the CPA in its totality. In this connection, they noted with appreciation the efforts of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees in attempting to promote consensus on this issue. However, in the light of continued deadlock the Foreign Ministers reiterated the sovereign right of CTR to take whatever action they deem necessary to safeguard their own national interests.

The Foreign Ministers expressed their grave concern over the recent upsurge of Cambodian boat people. They requested the UNHCR and other parties concerned to take the necessary measures to stop the outflow of this category of boat people and to prevent the exacerbation of the already complicated situation and heavy burdens of the first asylum countries in South East Asia. They are of the view that measures must be taken to include the Cambodian boat people within the purview of the international efforts to solve the problem.


The Foreign Ministers were of the view that concrete steps should further be taken to effectively implement the ASEAN Programme of Action adopted at the Third ASEAN Summit of 1987 concerning the Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality (ZOPFAN) and the South-East Asia Nuclear Weapon Free Zone (SEANWFZ). The Foreign Ministers viewed that ASEAN should continue and intensify the work on the draft Treaty on South-East Asia Nuclear Weapon Free Zone and to promote this concept with other states for the purpose of obtaining their support.


The Foreign Ministers reviewed the implementation of the decisions of the Third Meeting of the ASEAN Heads of Government, held in Manila, December 1987. They were pleased to note that considerable progress had been made during the past year, particularly in the establishment of sectoral dialogue relations with the Republic of Korea. An important development in the strengthening of ASEAN’s coordinating mechanism was the convening of the ASEAN Joint-Ministerial Meeting (JMM) of the Foreign and Economic Ministers. They welcomed the participation of the ASEAN Economic Ministers in the Post Ministerial Conferences especially as more economic issues were being discussed at these Meetings.

The Foreign Ministers approved the ASC’S recommendations on the improvement of the format of the PMCS.


The Foreign Ministers expressed great satisfaction over the initiatives taken by the ASEAN Standing Committee to strengthen the role and effectiveness of the ASEAN mechanism and structures, especially the ASEAN Secretariat and called for sustained efforts in this direction. They welcomed the assistance being rendered by UNDP, ADB, Canada, and the EC in support of these initiatives.

The Foreign Ministers agreed to the establishment of the UNDP Sponsored panel of five Eminent Persons to study and make the necessary recommendations on strengthening and revamping the structure and mechanism of ASEAN, in particular the ASEAN Secretariat.

The Foreign Ministers appointed Dr. Chng Meng Kng of Singapore to the new post of Deputy Secretary-General of the ASEAN Secretariat for a period of three years. The Foreign Ministers felt that the new post would assist in enhancing the role of the ASEAN Secretariat in line with the decision of the Third ASEAN Summit.


In reviewing the progress made in ASEAN cooperation over the past year, the Foreign Ministers noted with satisfaction the various programmes and activities undertaken to further promote intra-ASEAN cooperation, particularly in the fields of trade, energy, commodities, social welfare, culture, labour affairs, education, youth development, science and technology and civil service matters.

The Foreign Ministers expressed satisfaction that progress had been made in the finalization of Thailand’s ASEAN Potash Mining Project and noted that all the six ASEAN member countries would be participating as shareholders in the project.

The Foreign Ministers noted that the Revised Basic Agreement on ASEAN Industrial Joint Ventures (AIJV) would be amended in order to extend the deadline of 1990 for the 60% non-ASEAN equity participation in the AIJV up to the end of 1993.

The Foreign Ministers agreed on the establishment of the ASEAN Social Development Fund and, along with the ASEAN Science and Technology Fund which was created earlier, were convinced that these funds would help promote greater regional cooperation in these fields.

The Foreign Ministers welcomed the adoption of the Kuala Lumpur Accord on Environment and Development at the 4th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting on the Environment (AMME) held in Subang, Malaysia on 18-19 June 1990, which decided that a common ASEAN position on environmental matters be formulated for presentation to the Ministerial Level Conference on the Environment for Asia and the Pacific and later to the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992.

The Foreign Ministers noted with satisfaction the progress being made on the preparations for the Visit ASEAN Year 1992 (VAY’92) and requested the dialogue countries to contribute to the success of the programme.


Cognizant of the urgent need for ASEAN to cope with the rapid and dramatic developments taking place not only in Europe but also in the region and conscious of the challenges that these events will pose for ASEAN’s viability, the Foreign Ministers felt that it was timely to take more concrete steps towards more effective intra-ASEAN economic cooperation. In this connection the Foreign Ministers took particular note of the proposal of the Philippines for the conclusion of an ASEAN Treaty of Economic Cooperation and directed their senior officials, in coordination with senior economic officials and the Directors-General of the ASEAN National Secretariats to consider the setting up of a committee to study the need for a treaty or other framework for ASEAN economic cooperation for submission to the AEM for its consideration.


The Foreign Ministers acknowledged the growing importance of private sector participation in the dialogue process as well as in intra-ASEAN cooperation and expressed -the hope that such participation would be intensified.


The Foreign Ministers commended the continuing collaboration among the drug agencies and the non-governmental organizations in ASEAN in the combat against the drug problem. The Ministers also expressed their conviction that the drug problem could be dealt with more effectively through a coordinated multidisciplinary approach addressing simultaneously all aspects related to the drug menace, in collaboration with the international community.


The Foreign Ministers noted the report of the Fifth Meeting of the Ad-Hoc Working Group on APC-HRD, held in Jakarta on 22 February 1990. They expressed concern over the lack of progress made to date on the implementation of the Programme and called upon the dialogue partners for a more positive response to the project proposals submitted by ASEAN.


The Foreign Ministers reviewed the activities being implemented within the framework of ASEAN cooperation with dialogue countries and international organizations and noted with satisfaction the progress made in the various fields, particularly in the areas of development cooperation. The Foreign Ministers, however, expressed their disappointment on the slow progress on issues relating to improved market access for products of export interest to ASEAN.

The Foreign Ministers expressed satisfaction with the progress on the implementation of the ASEAN-Australia Economic Cooperation Programme (AAECP) Phase II and the focus given to the areas of trade and investment promotion, science and technology and agro-based projects, with special reference to Human Resources Development (HRD). The Foreign Ministers noted the broadening of the ASEAN-Australia Forum’s agenda to include cooperation in telecommunications, environment and education.

The Foreign Ministers noted with satisfaction the progress in the ASEAN-Canada dialogue relations. The Foreign Ministers also noted that the establishment of the Canada-ASEAN Centre in Singapore had resulted in improved management and coordination of the development cooperation programmes. The Foreign Ministers further expressed the hope that there would be greater increase in trade and investment cooperation between ASEAN and Canada. The Foreign Ministers welcomed the offer of the Canadian Government to host a Special ASEAN-Canada Ministerial Meting in Jasper, Canada on 5-7 October 1990 and hoped that the outcome of the Meeting would further enhance the ASEAN-Canada relations.

The Foreign Ministers noted the successful outcome of the 8th ASEAN-EC Ministerial Meeting, Kuching, Malaysia, 16-17 February 1990. In taking note of the developments in the Soviet Union and in Central and Eastern Europe, the Foreign Ministers expressed the hope that the EC’s commitment to assist these countries towards free-market economies would not be at the expense of ASEANEC ties. On the creation of the Single European Market, the Foreign Ministers urged the EC to ensure that its implementation would not adversely affect ASEAN’s interests. The Foreign Ministers reaffirmed that industrial cooperation should be accorded high priority in ASEAN-EC relations. The Foreign Ministers further urged the EC to provide improved market access for ASEAN exports.

The Foreign Ministers expressed satisfaction over Japan’s continuing support for ASEAN’s cultural and development cooperation activities. The Ministers expressed the hope that Japan would give priority consideration to the resolution of existing trade issues between ASEAN and Japan, particularly in the area of market access for products of interest to ASEAN. In this regard, the Ministers welcomed the convening of the first meeting between ASEAN and Japan trade experts in Tokyo in September 1990, as well as the participation for the first time by the private sector in the forthcoming 12th ASEAN-Japan Forum in Tokyo.

The Foreign Ministers welcomed measures to be taken by the New Zealand Government in across-the-board reduction in its tariff and other liberalization programmes in the industrial sector. The Foreign Ministers requested New Zealand to continue to find practical ways to resolve problems and obstacles to facilitate the entry of ASEAN export products to the New Zealand market. The Foreign Ministers also welcomed the implementation of the projects under Inter-institutional Linkages Programme (IILP) and the finalization of Trade and Investment Promotion Package (TIPP) projects.

The Foreign Ministers noted with satisfaction that the ASEAN-US Dialogue continued to serve as an important forum for cooperation in the areas of trade, investment and development. The Foreign Ministers welcomed the signing of the Project Grant Agreement on Private Investment and Trade Opportunities (PITO). The project set forth new directions for ASEAN-US cooperation which would enhance the participation of ASEAN and US private sectors in ASEAN-US trade and investment. On the ASEAN-US Initiative (AUI), the Foreign Ministers welcomed the decision of the AEM and the USTR to establish a Joint Working Group on ASEAN-US Economic Relations as a concrete effort not only to strengthen and improve the ASEAN-US economic and trade relations but also to complement the multilateral trading system under GATT.

The Foreign Ministers expressed their appreciation for the UNDP’s contribution to ASEAN development cooperation. In particular, the Foreign Ministers were pleased to note the preparations being made for the 5th UNDP Cycle (1992-1996) in the development of a programmatic approach to the formulation and implementation of the ASEAN-UNDP technical cooperation.


The Foreign Ministers noted with satisfaction the outcome of the Joint Ministerial Meeting held in Kuching, Malaysia, on 15 February 1990, in which ASEAN reaffirmed its position on APEC as stated at the Canberra Meeting on 6-7 November 1989. ASEAN would continue to be guided by the basic principles stated at the Canberra Meeting, which stated, inter alia, that the APEC should continue to be a loose, exploratory and informal consultative process, that APEC process should not dilute ASEAN’s identity and that it should not be directed towards the establishment of an economic trading bloc, as this would be contrary to ASEAN’s support for the establishment of a more fair and freer multilateral trading system. In pursuing this goal, ASEAN should take a pragmatic and gradual approach.

The Foreign Ministers welcomed the positive results of the two Meetings of APEC Senior Officials held in Singapore in March and May 1990 and looked forward to the opportunity for consultations with other participants on major economic developments and issues at the forthcoming Ministerial Meeting in Singapore, 29-31 July 1990.


The Foreign Ministers noted that the global economic scene was still characterized by the escalation of trade protectionism including new forms of protectionism, the unstable and low commodity prices, heavy debt burden and the drastic aggravation of reversed transfer of financial flows and the persistent monetary instability. The Foreign Ministers felt that it was therefore essential for the developed and developing countries to enhance their cooperation in addressing the global problems of an increasingly interdependent and integrated world economy.

The Foreign Ministers reaffirmed their strong commitment to the successful completion of the URMTN by December 1990 and urged the developed countries to adopt a more forthcoming and positive attitude in the remaining period of the Uruguay Round, taking fully into consideration the areas of interest to the developing countries particularly tropical products, agriculture, textiles and clothing, and international trading rules including antidumping and countervailing measures. The Foreign Ministers reiterated that Special and Differential treatment for developing countries was an integral element of the negotiations and that it should be applied to all aspects of the Uruguay Round.

The Foreign Ministers expressed concern at the adverse effects that the anti-tropical timber and anti-vegetable oil campaigns in certain developed countries were having on ASEAN exports earnings. The Foreign Ministers noted that an ASEAN Ministerial Delegation would be visiting the EC and other major consuming countries to counter the anti-tropical timber campaigns. The Foreign Ministers urged the developed countries to provide technical and research expertise to upgrade tropical forest management and development, so as to intensify R and D activities on tropical forests.

The Foreign Ministers were of the view that efforts should be made for the Common Fund for Commodities to become operational as soon as possible as it would give fresh impetus to international action in the area of commodities.

On the global debt problem, the Foreign Ministers expressed their concern over the growing financial outflows from developing countries in the form of external debt payment which constituted one of the most debilitating deterrents to sustained growth and development. The Foreign Ministers felt that a comprehensive, durable and development-oriented solution to that debt problem, based on the principle of shared responsibility of both debtors and creditors, was imperative.


The Foreign Ministers welcomed the First Meeting of the Summit Level Group for South-South Consultation and Cooperation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1-3 June 1990. The Foreign Ministers expressed the hope that this forum would further enhance cooperation through the revitalization of the North-South Dialogue and the strengthening of South-South cooperation.


With regard to the Southeast Asian region, the Foreign Ministers were of the view that the security situation in the area required careful observation at all times. In that light, they agreed on the need to conduct dialogue on the subject within the context of the Declaration of ASEAN Concord, Bali, 1976 and the Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality of 1971.


The Foreign Ministers welcomed the fundamental changes in East-West relations which have significantly improved the international climate for the promotion of peace, security and cooperation among states. In this connection, they further welcomed the positive results achieved recently by the Bush-Gorbachev as well as NATO Summit Meetings that inter alia agreed to ease tensions at global and regional levels with particular reference to the European region. .

The Foreign Ministers noted that the progress made in negotiations on nuclear, chemical and conventional disarmaments has resulted from the improved relations. Further progress in this field will contribute positively to international peace and security.

In reiterating their belief that nuclear disarmament negotiations should involve all nations under the aegis of the United Nations, the Foreign Ministers expressed their concern that such negotiations still remain the domain of the super powers.

The Foreign Ministers noted that the Fourth Review Conference for the Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is scheduled to take place in August 1990. Despite its shortcomings, they expressed their confidence in the NPT as an instrument to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and as a foundation for nuclear disarmament.

The Foreign Ministers expressed their support for the initiative by Indonesia, Mexico, Peru, Sri Lanka, Venezuela and Yugoslavia to convene a conference with a view to transforming the Partial Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). To achieve this objective, they called upon the nuclear weapon states to cooperate with the non-nuclear weapon states.

The Foreign Ministers welcomed the regional initiative to disseminate information on chemical weapons through seminars or workshops, as was done at Canberra and the forthcoming one to be organized in Venezuela. These initiatives would create a better appreciation of the urgent need to conclude at the earliest possible date a universal and comprehensive chemical weapons convention.


The Foreign Ministers welcomed the rapid and momentous development currently taking place in Eastern and Central Europe, in particular the establishment of greater political pluralism and movement towards a market economy, thus paving the way for larger trade and investment opportunities there. They looked forward to support the strengthening of the relations and the expansion of cooperation between the ASEAN countries and the countries of Eastern Europe in all fields of mutual benefit.


The Foreign Ministers reviewed the situation in the Middle East and expressed concern that despite positive developments taking place on the international scene, the situation in the occupied territories continues to deteriorate. They stressed the urgency for a settlement and reaffirmed their strong support for the International Peace Conference on the Middle East under the auspices of the United Nations in order to achieve a just, comprehensive and lasting solution. They reiterated their full support for the legitimate struggle of the Palestinian people to exercise their inalienable rights, including the right to self-determination and independence, and the restoration of Arab sovereignty over the occupied territories.

The Foreign Ministers deplored the creation of new settlements of Jewish immigrants in the Arab occupied territories by Israel. This unjustified act has serious consequences, including changes in the balance of the demographic composition, which would further complicate the search for a political solution to the conflict. This is also in violation of the relevant UN resolutions, basic principles of international law, especially the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, as well as the basic rights of the Palestinian people.

The Foreign Ministers expressed their regret over the suspension by the US of its dialogue with the PLO and called for its early resumption. They expressed their conviction that such a dialogue is an essential ingredient for resolving the Middle East conflict.


The Foreign Ministers reiterated their deep concern over the continuing conflict in Lebanon. They reaffirmed their support for the full sovereignty, territorial integrity and national unity of Lebanon. They expressed their belief that the Taif Agreement provides a suitable framework for dialogue and negotiations to preserve the integrity, independence and sovereignty of Lebanon and therefore urged all parties concerned to respect and accept the Taif Agreement.


The Foreign Ministers welcomed the meeting between the Foreign Ministers of Iran and Iraq held in Geneva on 4 July 1990 under the auspices of the United Nations.

The Foreign Ministers also welcomed the possibility of Summit level talks between the two states which would contribute to the attainment of peace on the basis of the UN Security Council Resolution 598. They also expressed their full support for the continuing efforts of the UN Secretary-General in bridging the differences between the two parties on the implementation of the UN Security Council Resolution 598.


The Foreign Ministers remained concerned over the prolonged conflict in Afghanistan. They urged all parties concerned to observe the Geneva Agreement on the Settlement of the Situation Relating to Afghanistan and to convene an intra-Afghan dialogue with a view to setting up a broad-based government in which all segments of the Afghan people.


The Foreign Ministers reaffirmed their condemnation of the apartheid system which constitutes a crime against humanity and reiterated their commitment to work for its total elimination. While welcoming the lifting of the ban on the African National Congress (ANC) and other anti-apartheid organizations as well as the release of Mr. Nelson Mandela. They believed that barriers to the total dismantling of the apartheid system remain in place. They agreed that sanctions by the international community had been responsible for bringing the Pretoria regime to the negotiating table. In this regard, they also agreed that sanctions must be maintained until complete dismantling of apartheid is irreversible.

The Foreign Ministers expressed their appreciation for the contribution made by the UN Security Council as well as the important role of the United Nations Iran-Iraq Military Observer Group (UNIIMOG) in maintaining the cease-fire and easing of tension.

The Foreign Ministers welcomed the newly proclaimed independence of Namibia and its membership in the United Nations and the Commonwealth. They pledged their commitment to work towards closer cooperation with Namibia in meeting the challenges of its post-independence era.


The Foreign Ministers agreed that the Twenty Fourth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting would be held in Malaysia in June 1991.

The Delegations of Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand expressed their sincere and deep appreciation to the Government and people of the Republic of Indonesia for their warm and generous hospitality and the excellent facilities and efficient arrangements made for the Meeting.

The Meeting was held in the traditional spirit of ASEAN friendship and solidarity.